Climate Feedback

Breadbasket or dust bowl?

dustbowl_kansas293x227s.jpgThe Great Plains of the United States, late twenty-first century: breadbasket or dust bowl?

It may depend on groundwater storage, finds a study published in Nature Geoscience this week (subscription required). The results are based on an unusually sophisticated watershed model that connects the below-ground water sources, surface water and the land surface itself.


The authors, Reed Maxwell at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, and Stefan Kollet of Bonn University, Germany, use actual climate data from 1999 as control conditions for the Great Plains watershed model. Then they ask how the results alter when a temperature rise and/or rainfall changes are added to that baseline.

This is where groundwater comes in. Write Maxwell and Kollet:

There is evidence that whereas drought timing may depend on sea surface temperature, the length and depth of major droughts in the region depend on soil moisture conditions and land-atmosphere interactions.

Their various climate simulations do show differences in soil moisture, as well as in the land-atmosphere interactions that contribute to soil-drying evaporation. And those differences are related to the flow of water through the soil, says Maxwell. Groundwater flows, he says, “dictate whether we’re going to be in a dust-bowl drought,” like the one the region experienced in the 1930s, “a mega-drought that’s beyond what we’ve seen on record, or a wet period.”

Where the water table is shallow – that is, where water saturates the soil at or near its surface, as in river valleys – the temperature rise of 2.5 C that Maxwell and Kollet test in the model is the main factor controlling whether the ground shrivels in the sun. On hilltops, which have deep water tables, precipitation is key because groundwater is too far from the surface to influence dry-out. And at an in-between groundwater depth of two to five metres – a sweet spot also identified in their previous paper (subscription, Water Resources Research) – groundwater level itself is the main influence.

This connection between water underground and moist, bountiful soils should be important in forseeing whether the Great Plains can remain the agricultural heartland of a warming US. But groundwater levels themselves depend on human responses to climate change: some solutions use more water than others. The new results suggest that groundwater shortages caused by intensive irrigation, for example, could feed back as worse climate change. And there’s every reason, Maxwell says, to expect that similar types of systems operate in other regions – though exact numbers such as the most influential water-table depths may differ from place to place.

“The water-management issue and the climate-feedback issue cannot be decoupled,” he adds. “These two are thought about in very different boxes, but they’re all part of the same thing.”

Anna Barnett

Photo: Soil blown by dust bowl winds piled up in large drifts in March 1936 near Liberal, Kansas; Library of Congress.

Vote or comment on the importance of this paper in the Journal Club at Nature Reports Climate Change.

Comments

  1. Report this comment

    Larry Sheldon said:

    It also depends on how much of the grassland is torn up to plant E85 in.

  2. Report this comment

    David B. Benson said:

    Suggests the need to switch to less water intensive crops.

  3. Report this comment

    Charles Weber said:

    Increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is undoubtedly increasing climate warmth. However I suspect that also a great affect on warmth is the baring of soil by increase in annual crop acreage, roads, buildings, grazing, and desertification. You may see an article that discusses this in more detail in .

    I see no reason why many water problems can not be much ameliorated by intelligent management of water both before and after the water reaches the soil.

Comments are closed.