« Ones that got away | Main | A better pathway for biomass? »

Bookmark in Connotea

Obama backs Bush on polar bear

polar.bear.jpg
Despite pressure from many environmentalists, the Obama administration upheld a Bush administration rule limiting the regulatory impact of last year's decision to list the polar bear as a threatened species.

The rule would essentially prevent the Endangered Species Act from becoming a venue for arguments about greenhouse gas emissions. And the logic is simple enough: Bear biologists hopefully have better things to do than analyze greenhouse gases from, say, a cement plant in Georgia, even if emissions from that plant contribute to global warming and the retreat of sea ice, which ultimately translates into hungry bears.

"We already are doing everything we can to protect the polar bear," US Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told reporters Friday. "The Endangered Species Act, however, is not in my view the proper mechanism for controlling our nation’s carbon emissions."

Continue reading 'Obama backs Bush on polar bear' on Nature's The Great Beyond blog

Image courtesy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8207

Comments

Climate Change Conference - Dec 07

Hi all great forum. I hope you dont mind but I wanted to raise the issue of climate change. There will be a conference for Climate Change Conference - Dec 07 in Copenhagen.

We cant ignore it we are all detroying our planet with CO2, each year its getting hotter and winters are getting shorter. The ice is melting and the sea and coral are dying, chocked with C02. We must take action now and not just accept words from our politicians. We must ALL take action. Please take part and get invloved before its too late for us and our children.

See below:

Campaign against Climate Change

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'climatefeedback at nature.com'.

please enter code

Categories