Climate Feedback

Why a climate crisis is like an epileptic seizure

tippingpoint.bmpTipping points – those critical thresholds in a complex system where a small nudge can cause a catastrophic response – are perhaps the most fearsome threats to the Earth’s climate, but they also haunt ecosystems, financial markets, and even sufferers of medical conditions such as epilepsy and asthma. A fascinating review in Nature today (subscription) sketches out the mathematical patterns on which many of these instances seem to be based, and describes giveaway signs that might warn us to change course before the system tips.

One common warning sign, for example, is flickering between the pre-tipping point state and the post-tipping point state. In climatology, abrupt changes traced in records of the Earth’s past suggest the planet has regularly gone through tipping points, such as the sudden warm-ups that change glacial periods into deglaciations. Earlier this year researchers reported in Nature Geoscience that rapid flickering signaled the end of Earth’s most recent cold spell, the so-called Younger Dryas period. The authors of the new review, led by Marten Scheffer of Wageningen University in The Netherlands, say that in a similar way, debilitating epileptic seizures can be preceded by frequent small symptomless seizures – the ‘flickers’ of the epileptic brain.


The diagram above shows a kind of Platonic tipping point that can explain this behaviour. Solid lines represent stable states, and the system usually sticks to these paths like a ball in a track. The areas in between are called ‘basins of attraction’, and the grey arrows show which direction the ball will be attracted if it gets bumped off its track. Depending on the shape of the curve and the amount of random noise affecting the system, in some cases a ‘ball’ approaching a critical threshold is likely to get knocked off its track and into the opposite basin of attraction, ending up on the other track – and then get knocked back again. It can go back and forth until it passes the point where there are two side-by-side tracks (or stable states). Going further into simple models like this one, the authors point out other tell-tale warnings, such as a slowdown in the response to perturbations as a tipping point is approached.

This type of analysis popped up in climate change headlines last November. The report that, if it weren’t for human meddling, the planet would be on its way into another ice age (in a mere 10,000 to 100,000 years) was based on the kind of dynamics that Scheffer et al. are reviewing.

The group says such generic early warning signals are an excellent thing when a system’s mechanisms and feedbacks are too murky to allow confident predictions. And if we want the most reliable heads-up on future catastrophes, they say, we should look at patterns across space as well as time, “as a spatial pattern contains much more information than does a single point in a time series, in principle allowing shorter lead times.” The more robust our Earth monitoring programs, then, the better use we can make of this mathematical weathervane.

Anna Barnett

Image: Reproduced from Nature 461, 53-59 (2009).

Comments

  1. Report this comment

    zanardm said:

    A Return to Phanerozoic Average Sea Level?

    Might we be near the end of a large cyclical regression; not so different from Permian end regression? Statistically might it not seem more likely that we are due to revert at least towards an average of sea level for overall Phanerozoic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phanerozoic, or even a further transgression? Might this be a natural underlying trend, independent of any superimposed anthropomorphic effect? Might we be headed for an Eocene/Paleocene world? A 200 meter rise would be up to ~ sea level for end Eocene/Paleocene; IF east Antarctica melted in ~ 15,000 years, then perhaps 100 meter or more rise?

    30 million years hence, what might our ‘present’ stratum (pl: strata) of say 10 million years look like? Might there be any evidence of mankind? For example, if we occupy the middle of such strata, then plus or minus 5 million years. For the past 5 million years, there was no effect. For the future 5 million years, transgression and Yellowstone’s Western and Midwest repeated ash fallout would seem to reveal nature’s dominant hand. For 200 meter elevation of sea level to less than Cretaceous peak, most of southern U.S. would be inundated, and likewise for eastern coast. The Seaway would flood and enlarge Great Lakes into an inland sea. All coastal cities, and inland lake ports would become reefs initially, and then dissolution. Humanity would would once again be on the move. Therefore, might there be no evidence of mankind’s handiwork in such strata (stratum); not even hard plastic cherts? So from a geological perspective, mankind’s impact on the environment might be quite negligible, in comparison to nature’s broader, deeper, more sustainable ways. Does our myopia greatly underestimate nature’s scope and impact, in comparison to that of mankind’s? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level

Comments are closed.