Inherently Responsive

October 14, 2008

Winning by Losing in the Human Genome?

The idea that evolution is led by increasing genetic complexity has, over the years, annealed into the general opinion of geneticists. This increasing complexity is developed through the expensive and slow innovation cycle of gene duplication, mutation, and selection; and so, it seems contrary that a species’ fitness could be improved by losing hard-won genetic capabilities, as has been proposed by the “less is more” hypothesis (Olson, 1999). For that reason, genetic research has traditionally dealt with active genes instead of “broken” ones (or pseudogenes). The lack of a deep knowledge about the genomic significance of adaptive gene losses in mammalian genome evolution explains the important contribution of a recent study in this research area (Zhu et al, 2007). This recent work applied an ingenious method to systematically identify the losses of genes that had been long established in the human lineage over the last 75 million years. A total of 26 well-established genes, inactivated long after their birth, were identified by this analysis, with the identification of 16 previously uncharacterized human pseudogenes. This work completes former studies about pseudogene formation during human origin (Wang et al, 2006), and provides important insights for a better comprehension of this particular genetic phenomenon, in a field scarcely documented until now.

Continue Reading...

"Winning by Losing in the Human Genome?" »

July 15, 2008

Rapid Correspondence - Gender Genomics and Equality

In response to the recent publication of the Florida Lancelet's genome draft in the June 19th issue of Nature (Nature 453:1064-1071), Mark Hauber of the University of Auckland, New Zealand and colleagues here highlight the important and broader issue of gender genomics in this context.

"Rapid Correspondence - Gender Genomics and Equality" »

June 05, 2008

Book Review - 'Speciation in Birds' by Trevor Price

"Book Review - 'Speciation in Birds' by Trevor Price" »

May 02, 2008

Rapid Correspondence - Molecular clock debate

The complex issue of mtDNA rate measurement is a topic of hot debate. In the first issue of Heredity this year H-J Bandelt (Heredity 100, 1-2) provided an interesting news and commentary on this topic, discussing the use of simple mtDNA clocks in molecular dating.

Howell et al. here provide a detailed response to Prof Bandelt's commentary, arguing that mtDNA evolution is not clock-like and that the evidence for time dependent rates should not be dismissed.


"Rapid Correspondence - Molecular clock debate" »

February 27, 2008

Rapid Correspondence - DNA barcoding plants in biodiversity hotspots

Peter Hollingsworth of the Royal Botanic Gardens in Edinburgh, UK presents an interesting commentary on a recent work on DNA barcoding in the flora of biodiversity hotspots published in PNAS this month.

"Rapid Correspondence - DNA barcoding plants in biodiversity hotspots" »

January 21, 2008

Rapid Correspondence - One-sided evolution or two? A reply to Ennos

A recent News and Commentary published in Heredity (Heredity 100, 3-4) proposed an alternative hypothesis to the 'pollinator shift' hypothsis suggested in a letter by Whittall and Hodges published in Nature (Nature 447, 706-709) . Here, Scott Hodges and Justen Whittall provide their response to this.

"Rapid Correspondence - One-sided evolution or two? A reply to Ennos" »

November 16, 2007

Rapid Correspondence - More on mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in birds

Further to an earlier response by AJR Hickey on the forum (Heredity, in press) to Berlin et al.'s paper on low mitochondrial diversity in birds, Nick Lane now contributes his thoughts on the subject.

"Rapid Correspondence - More on mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in birds" »