Nature India | Indigenus

Polluting radiation

This week, questions were raised on India’s national regulations on radioactive waste disposal after a scrap dealer and six of his employees in the national capital were hospitalised with severe Cobalt-60 poisoning. The Mayapuri area of west Delhi became a ticking time bomb of sorts with new cases of radioactive poisoning being reported every day. All 800 shops in the scrap market were scanned and 10 sources of radioactive Cobalt-60 were found.

The sad part is India does not yet have a proper radiation monitoring mechanism in place. The law does have a cursory provision in the Atomic Energy Act of 1962 but it generally concerns only the mega nuclear projects. This leaves everyone else at potential risk. The Union government’s Department of Atomic Energy (DoAE) and Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) monitor radioactive materials. The procurement and disposal of Cobalt 60 and radioactive sources are regulated by Mumbai-based AERB, which is also responsible for implementing the Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004.

The Mayapuri incident has set the Delhi state government thinking though. Ahead of the weekend, it was already talking of amending its waste disposal law by including disposal of radioactive materials in the Bio-Medical Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998. The idea is to include radioactive materials used in hospitals in the rule so that monitoring becomes easier. The municipal body would also install radiation detection machines at the border check posts to monitor all incoming material.

The incident has reinforced the need for national regulations as well as a national regulatory body to look into radiation pollution outside of nuclear plants. Also the need for fixing accountability of the state governments to monitor such hazardous wastes dumped out of all possible sources — hospitals, scrap markets, recycling units and state entry points.


  1. Report this comment

    Aarti Gokhale said:

    Hi Subhra,

    I read your blogs fairly regularly. They are quite good and very current. I wanted to write a blog for Nature India. How can I go about doing it?



  2. Report this comment

    Sriram said:

    Environmental Health and Safety or Occupational Health Services departments at UK and US institutions oversee matters relating to radiation, biologics, and other related safety issues. During my entire educational career, I have never met a single regulatory officer at various campuses that I went to in India. I hope this tragic news about the consequences of unregulated radioactive disposal steamrolls new change in the system.

  3. Report this comment

    Sriram said:

    Follow-up: I just read some news release by The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) that does the blame-shifting to the University but does little to own responsibility. The agency that ostensibly is supposed to regulate things doesn’t even know if the irradiator at the Delhi University’s Chemistry Department was registered. It is looking into BARC records to verify the registration but is ready to make statements that AERB is “contemplating severe punishment.. for the chemistry department”. Shouldn’t the agency also be held to its responsibility of not enforcing safety regulations?

  4. Report this comment


    Hi Subhra, I have seen and read the POLLUTING RADIATION piece. It is a good critic but general public is unaware about radioecology of radiation and its potential source. To some extent, lack of radiological awareness causes the problem.

  5. Report this comment


    Pollution due to radiation is a menace to society. Agencies generally follow radiation pollution ethics casually and general public to some extent are exposed to anthropogenic sources of radiation pollution. For example at the entry and exit points of Delhi Metro and airports of india as well all over world. So in my opinion, continuous monitoring of regular commuters is a must.