« Eörs Szathmáry | Main | Manyuan Long »

David K. Campbell

Boston University, USA

A physicist highlights a three-in-one deal for nonlinear science

As a student of nonlinear phenomena, I am continually amazed by new examples of deterministic chaos, solitary
waves and fractals.

A recent study (R. H. Goodman and R. Haberman Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 104103; 2007) gave me the rare pleasure of seeing all three of these fundamental manifestations of nonlinearity woven together.

This paper addresses the collisions of solitary waves — localized nonlinear waves that propagate without changing shape and are found in systems ranging from solids to optical fibres.

In the 1980s, with several colleagues, I studied this problem numerically (see, for example, D. K. Campbell and M. Peyrard Physica D 18, 47–53; 1986). We discovered a surprising 'bounce' phenomenon, in which solitary waves would collide, remain trapped for a number (n) of bounces and then escape to infinity. This behaviour occurred only when the waves had specific relative velocities on colliding; these bounce windows were interspersed with regions in which the waves repelled each other immediately.

We developed a heuristic explanation for this behaviour, consistent with the waves behaving like elastic particles that can be deformed, but fell short of developing a full analytical explanation.
Journal club

Goodman and Haberman have now developed an analytical treatment of this effect and have shown, in their words, "that clusters of (n+1)-bounce windows accumulate at the edges of each n-bounce window, repeated at diminishing scales" in an effective fractal structure. This also means that the outcome of a collision is exquisitely sensitive to the initial velocity, a hallmark of deterministic chaos.

If all the above seems dry, take a look at the wonderful graphic (here) from the article, which represents the number of bounces as a function of the collision parameters. The image is certainly worth more than these few hundred words.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3580

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.