« Benny Freeman | Main | Michelle D. Wang »

Francis Albarede

Ecole Normale Supérieure, Lyon, France

A geochemist wonders about the Solar System's true age.

Scientists have long looked at the constituent elements of meteorites to find out how old the Sun and its planets are. The most perfect example of the oldest meteorites — those that formed at the same time as the planets — broke up and fell as a large shower near Pueblito de Allende in Mexico in 1969. This was named the Allende chondrite, and was recently the subject of a study by Jim Connelly of the University of Texas at Austin and his colleagues.

Meteorites are often dated by measuring how much aluminium-26 they contain. This isotope decays at a rate that allows researchers to tell when one meteorite is older than another, but too fast to work out these rocks' absolute ages. For the relative ages to be accurate, however, aluminium-26 must have been spread evenly among the protoplanetary debris from which meteorites were born. If it was not, this isotope would reflect where they formed as well as when they formed, and meteorite chronologies would be higgledy piggledy.

But true ages can be calculated from lead isotopes. Until recently, lead had not been measured in both of two common parts of the oldest meteorites — chrondules and calcium–aluminium-rich inclusions — for any one rock, and there was no way of telling whether different rocks formed in the same bit of the nascent Solar System. But the lead isotopes in both chrondules and calcium–aluminium-rich inclusions can be counted in Allende.

Connelly and his team have confirmed an age difference between the chondrules and calcium–aluminium-rich inclusions that had been inferred from aluminium-26 measurements. This means that the relative meteorite chronologies are correct, and that aluminium-26 was indeed evenly distributed when the Sun ignited (J. N. Connelly et al. Astrophys. J. 675, L121–L124; 2008). If this is right, then the Solar System must be 4,567.5 million years old.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5884

Comments

Hi Francis,

For information on the Solar System's true age I recommend papers by the late Professor Paul K. Kuroda that show:

a) Formation of the Solar System started 5.1 Ga ago, soon after the explosion of a supernova (based on Pu-244/Xe-136 ages of lunar samples and meteorites) , and

b) The breakup of meteorite parent bodies occurred 4.6 Ga ago, the age generally assumed for the solar system (in attempts to explain experimental data of older Pb/Pb and K/Ar ages).

Kuroda and Myers summarized these findings in the Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium that Glenn Seaborg and I organized on the Origin of Elements in the Solar System [Xenology, FUN anomalies and the plutonium-244 story, in "Origin of Elements in the Solar System: Implications of Post-1957 Observations" (ed. O. Manuel) pp. 431-499. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, New York, USA].

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.