« Jason W. Chin | Main | Sue Gibson »

Paul Knoepfler

University of California, Davis

A cell biologist looks at the risk and promise of a new insight into stem cells and cancer.

I study both stem and tumour cells, and am fascinated by their close relationship. Both exhibit pluripotency — the capacity to develop into any cell type — and the ability to cause cancer. Even some apparently normal stem cells can cause tumours, whereas others, sometimes from the same culture, lack this power. It seems that not all stem cells are created equal — even in the same dish.

A recent paper from Mickie Bhatia's group (T. E. Werbowetski-Ogilvie et al. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 91–97; 2009) is the first to directly address this heterogeneity in human embryonic stem cell (ESC) cultures. The team found that individual human ESC lines contain significant subpopulations that vary in a number of ways, including in tumorigenicity.

Variant human ESC lines were about 20 times more tumorigenic than the cultures they had been derived from and showed small changes in chromosome structure. These could be identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), but were not detectable by standard karyotyping. Thus for 'normal' stem cells being considered for use in regenerative medicine, karyotyping is not enough. Screening should also include aCGH, and perhaps an analysis of gene-expression patterns.

This previously covert diversity has implications for both tumour biology and medical applications involving stem cells. It may shed light on the 'locked in' self-renewal that is emerging as an important feature of many sorts of tumour and tumour stem cell.

The heterogeneity of human ESC cultures represents an additional hurdle in terms of producing safe stem-cell-based transplants. At the same time, it may offer a valuable bonus: the chance to purify variant human ESC sub-lines that are less tumorigenic.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/7417

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.