« Paolo Tammaro | Main | Ahmad M. Khalil »

Frank Wilczek

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

A theoretical physicist examines exotic particles lurking in new materials.

Axions are very light, very weakly interacting particles, whose existence was posited more than 30 years ago [1,2] in order to clean up our ‘standard model’ of particle physics [3]. They close an annoying loophole in Kobayashi and Maskawa’s Nobel-prize-winning explanation of why the microscopic laws of physics look so nearly the same when running backwards as forwards in time (time reversal symmetry).

Despite heroic efforts — and several false alarms — axions have not yet been detected, but they have become increasingly important. They have been warmly embraced in unified field theories and in string theory. And when we run the equations through Big-Bang cosmology, we find that axions should contribute much of the dark matter that astronomers have inferred to explain the Universe [5].

Now Shou-Cheng Zhang and his colleagues (X.-L. Qi et al. Phys. Rev. B78, 195424; 2008) inform us that, all along, axions have been lurking unrecognized on surfaces of bismuth-tin alloys and other materials. To be more precise: the equations that arise in axion physics [6,7] are the same as those that describe the electromagnetic behaviour of a recently discovered class of materials known, collectively, as topological insulators [8,9].
The axion field inside topological insulators is an emergent — and subtle — property of collections of electrons that is connected to their spin–orbit coupling.

These ‘quasi-axions’ don’t improve our standard model, but they do have the charming advantage of being accessible, possibly even useful. There are ideas to exploit their behaviour to make anyons [10], potential building blocks for quantum computation.

No short summary can do justice to the wealth of ideas synthesized in this paper. Powerful, beautiful mathematics is at play in reality.

1. Weinberg. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
2. Wilczek, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
3. Peccei, R. & Quinn, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)
4. Svrcek, P. & Witten, E. J. High Energy Phys. 0606 (2006).
5. Hertzberg, M., Tegmark, M. & Wilczek. F. Phys.Rev. D78, 083507 (2008).
6. Huang, M. & Sikivie, P. Phys. Rev. D32, 1560 (1985).
7. Wilczek, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799 (1987).
8. Kane, C. & Mele,E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005).
9. Fu, L., Kane, C. & Mele, E. Phys. Rev. 98, 106803 (2007).
10. Fu, L. & Kane, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008).

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/7630

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.