« Kishan Dholakia | Main | Frank Wilczek »

Paolo Tammaro

University of Manchester, UK

A physiologist notes the similarities between animal and plant electricity.

Almost all organisms run on electricity. As an undergraduate, I was intrigued by the fact that the long, single cells of the freshwater plant Nitella are nearly identical to those of single nerve fibres. These plant cells generate slow action potentials that are similar to those of human or animal nerves. But the electrical components that span plant and animal membranes — the ion channels and transporter proteins — are usually quite different, as are some of the ions they transport.

Earlier this year, however, two researchers in Italy found that a single mutation can turn an important transport protein from a component that is compatible with animal electrical systems into one that is appropriate for plants. They studied the protein CLC-5, which is abundant in the intracellular vesicles of kidney cells. There, it exchanges chloride ions for protons, and in so doing regulates the vesicles' acid content (G. Zifarelli and M. Pusch EMBO J. 28, 175–182; 2009).

The researchers knew that CLC-5 resembled the plant transporter atCLCa, but they had no idea how closely. In plant vacuoles, which are formed by the fusion of several vesicles, atCLCa exchanges not chloride but nitrate ions for protons. The difference is vital: nitrate is necessary for plants to grow and is stored in the vacuoles of root and shoot cells, whereas chloride has a very different role. It is needed for photosynthesis and for the opening and closing of stomata, which matters mostly in the leaves.

Merely substituting one serine amino acid in CLC-5 with a proline changed the protein from a chloride transporter into a nitrate transporter. I find this fascinating because it provides an even more striking example of the similarities that animals and plants can share, even though their biologies are generally very different.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/7596

Comments

wiritng to follow up on article refs Tammaro - plants/aminal electricty

Can you guide me :-
a]I am trying to scientifically validate tree hugging amonsgt other things - poss means of reducing stress and mentanl illness and creating a new conduit for getting people in deprived/ city area to communicate -
b]of many I have just self published a discussion book on Bovis Units to measures energy from trees.

c]It seems that Schumann waves might be the waves of communication as earth/man and tree resonates at 7.82 and after trying to understand Tromp's Psyhical Physics - Rawles on animals plant magnetism /Work by Callhan on infra red /Backster on Physical plants
d] I am trying to find out if plants communicate by infra red/ take in sounds carried on 7.84 Hz

e] I am in process of getting to first draft on book on this subject after 3 yrs

f] I can show through dowsing that you can communicate with plants/trees in binary
is is sap flow creating current
is it Schumann waves,
is it cellular UV

If my direction is right then we need to build this consideration our town planning system

hope this makes sense
regards michael

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.