« Pavel Jungwirth | Main | Omar Tonsi Eldakar »

Douglas Kell

The University of Manchester, UK

A systems biologist ponders how disparate ideas can sometimes come together beautifully.

If X alone and Y alone cannot explain a phenomenon, sometimes together they can. As the late biochemist Henrik Kacser remarked: "To understand the whole you must look at the whole."

Prion diseases, for example, are closely associated with the conformational change of the prion protein PrP from its normal form to an aggregating, autocatalysing, pathologic form, PrPSc. But clumping prions don't tell the whole story. Their levels often correlate poorly with disease progression, and it is far from clear how a simple conformational change leads to the holes in brain tissue seen in late-stage disease.

It is also clear that poorly liganded iron is highly neurotoxic, mainly because it can spur the production of the highly reactive and toxic hydroxyl radical OH* — heavily involved in the progression of many other degenerative diseases and ageing. Neena Singh at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and her colleagues have now tied these two disparate threads together.

PrPSc, they found, can sequester cellular iron in insoluble PrPSc–ferritin complexes, making it bio-unavailable, leading to increased iron uptake and an overall excess of iron in brain tissue (A. Singh et al., PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000336; 2009). Modified iron metabolism is found in both scrapie and sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, and such work stresses that it is not only the total amount of Fe(II) and Fe(III) that matters but their speciation. It is yet to be shown whether PrPSc–ferritin complexes catalyse OH* production directly, but if they do, this could account for the massive damage observed. Recognition of this could have a colossal effect on our thinking and provide new therapeutic (and dietary) options based on iron chelation for these and other syndromes.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8982

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.