« Corinne Le Quéré | Main | Jan Zaanen »

Jonathan Weissman

University of California, San Francisco

A biochemist looks at how DNA sequencing can reveal more than just sequences.

Huge advances in DNA sequencing have allowed us to readily determine the sequence of almost any living (and a few extinct) species. Yet arguably, most biological insight comes from work on five model organisms: Escherichia coli, baker's yeast, roundworms, fruitflies and mice. Unfortunately, many important biological processes are not captured in these creatures.

Papers from two groups, one led by Andrew Camilli of Tufts University in Boston, Massachusetts, the other by Brian Akerley at the University of Massachusetts in Worcester, describe new genetic tools that allow the quantitative dissection of gene function in a wide range of microorganisms (T. van Opijnen et al. Nature Methods 6, 767–772; 2009; and J. D. Gawronski et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16422–16427; 2009). These studies combine exhaustive transposon mutagenesis — whereby thousands of small DNA segments, or transposons, are introduced into the genome to mutate many genes — with massively parallel, or 'deep' sequencing of transposon/chromosome junctions to monitor the consequences of the loss of single or pairs of genes on the organisms' traits.

The real power of the approaches comes from the deep sequencing, which tracks the abundance of individual transposon mutants after they have been subjected to a stress. Knowing by how much each mutant has grown or suffered under the stress provides a measure of the relative roles that the mutated genes have.

I find it particularly gratifying that the advances in deep sequencing that have allowed us to catalogue so many genes from so many organisms can now be harnessed to help us figure out what these genes actually do.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9720

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'journalclub at nature.com'.