« Nature special feature on scientific misconduct | Main | EMBO journal picture competition »

Bookmark in Connotea

Banned words in titles

The always stimulating Language Log blog features a post on hated words in titles. Current suggestions for a world ban are whither, revisited, status, role and (lower-case n) nature.

These words may crop up more frequently in the linguistics literature than they do as part of titles in the scientific literature. A favourite phrase that is usually edited out of titles on Nature journals is "Evidence for". "New" is an over-used word in titles, and indeed in the body of the paper. Any other pet hates that cause the reader's eyes hastily to move on to the next item in the table of contents?

Posted by Maxine Clarke on January 19, 2007
Categories: Writing | | Comments (0)

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code

Search