« Nature Nanotechnology calling for papers | Main | EMBO award for communication in the life sciences »

Bookmark in Connotea

Strengthening gender equity for physics researchers

This month's Editorial in Nature Physics (3, 363; 2007) is entitled Take the lead, and is about how to tackle the under-representation of women at all career levels in physics research.
From the Editorial:
Last month, a workshop entitled Gender Equity: Strengthening the Physics Enterprise in Universities and National Laboratories took place at the headquarters of the American Physical Society in Maryland, with the stated aim of facilitating a doubling of the number of women in physics over the next 15 years. The under-representation of women in research careers in physics is proving a tough nut to crack. Why would this workshop, ahead of many other well-meaning efforts, come any closer to a solution?
What was remarkable about the Maryland workshop was its participants: chairs from 50 major physics departments across the USA, 14 division directors of national laboratories units, and leaders from the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy. After all, if there is to be change, it has to come from the top.
In the list of preliminary recommendations from the workshop, many begin with the words "leaders should". Leaders should "set a code of conduct", "make expectations clear", "be aware of subtle biases" and so on. Many of these recommendations are easily recognizable as good management practice. A good manager creates the appropriate atmosphere in which all team members can thrive, each being encouraged to play to their strengths, and, through their collective effort, carry the interests of the team forwards. That picture doesn't necessarily describe the average physics research group — although it probably should.

See here for the full text of the Editorial (subscription or site licence required).
See here for the conference website, from which you can download most of the talks as PDFs as well as obtain other resources.


Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code