« A timely reminder | Main | Momentum and meritocracy? »

Bookmark in Connotea

Humour in scientific writing

Clarity and obfuscation in scientific papers is the title of a post by Dr Free-Ride (a.k.a. philosophy professor Janet Stemwedel). The post isn't as dry as it may seem from its title, as it draws attention to this list of common statements in scientific writing, and what they really mean. Examples are along the lines of:

"It is generally believed that"
I think this and at least one other person agrees with me.

"Additional work will be required to elucidate the mechanism"
I don't have a clue what is going on and I'm not going to be the one to figure it out.

While acknowledging the humour in the list, Dr Free-Ride asks why some people use words "whose meaning is distant from the truth" in their scientific writing, and how this relates to the "reward structure" for scientists.

Comments

This reminds me of the recent paper by Kaj Sand-Jensen entitled How to write consistently boring scientific literature published earlier this ear in Oikos, which is also summed up in this post.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code