« Getting the story right | Main | Choose your favourite science blog »

Bookmark in Connotea

50 years of the clonal selection theory

October 2007 marks the 50th anniversary of the publication in the Australian Journal of Science of Frank Macfarlane Burnet's clonal selection theory, an intellectual framework that revolutionized the field of immunology.
Nature Immunology celebrates the event in an editorial (Nature Immunology 8, 1009; 2007) and a historical Commentary by Philip Hodgkin, William Heath and Alan Baxter (Nature Immunology 8, 1019-1026; 2007). Accompanying this Commentary is the two-page manuscript from the Australian Journal of Science in which Frank Macfarlane Burnet presented clearly for the first time the ideas that underlie the modern science of immunology (reprinted with permission from the Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science).
Nature Reviews Immunology celebrates the achievement by a Viewpoint article in which Melvin Cohn, N. Av Mitchison, William E. Paul, Arthur M. Silverstein, David W. Talmage and Martin Weigert, scientists working or who have worked in the field, provide their thoughts and opinions (Nature Reviews Immunology 7, 823-830; 2007).
From the Nature Immunology historical Commentary:

Rarely has a field as large and influential been gathered together and encapsulated in so spare a form. The modern reader can still appreciate the paper's brevity, clarity and masterly exposition of scientific method. It is worth rereading not only for its significant historical importance, but also because we see the individual creative scientist at work. Burnet's personal ambition to solve the problem of antibody specificity is clear, and he leaves plenty of clues for us to trace the evolution of the ideas that led to his solution and identify the colleagues who helped in its formulation. There is also mystery associated with the paper, such as why it is in such an obscure journal and what David Talmage's impact was on Burnet's ideas. Speculation on these issues has kept interest in the paper high over the decades.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code