« National Academy members' biographies | Main | Accountability of authors »

Bookmark in Connotea

New diagnostics supplement from Nature Reviews Microbiology

Effective diagnostics are a crucial element of successful infectious disease management, yet their development and use, particularly in the developing world, remains a neglected area. To address this deficiency, Nature Reviews Microbiology is producing a series of user-friendly diagnostic evaluation guides as supplements to the journal.
The latest of these guides is now published, focusing on visceral leishmaniasis. You can access this guide free here.
This supplement is part of the Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development, organized by the Council of Science Editors. All articles from Nature Publishing Group are available free. The content from all participating journals can be found here.
Robert G. Ridley, Director of the UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme on Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, writes in his Editorial to the visceral leishmaniasis supplement (Nature Reviews Microbiology , S1; November 2007): "Apart from the lack of investment by public sector agencies and lack of commercial incentive, three major challenges in this field deserve highlighting. First, there is the scientific challenge to identify and develop diagnostic methodologies and techniques that can readily guide treatment. This is further complicated by the multiple Leishmania species that can cause VL [visceral leishmaniasis] and the multiple disease manifestations. Second, there is the challenge — addressed by this supplement — of ensuring effective and harmonized evaluation of diagnostic tests. Third, there is the need to develop regulatory controls that ensure appropriate evaluation of diagnostic tests before they come on the market and ensure sustained quality of manufacture and production, against defined standards, after they have been given marketing authorization."
The rest of the supplement is available here.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code