« Nature's alternative climate-change conference | Main | Stimulate your brain in more ways than one »

Bookmark in Connotea

Steps required for good mentoring

In a Commentary in the latest (January) issue of Nature Immunology (9, 3-5; 2008), Mentoring and networking: how to make it work, Laura Haynes and coauthors describe the importance and steps required for good mentoring and networking.
Mentoring is considered so important for the development of scientists that the National Science Foundation now requires its grantees to provide information on how they will mentor postdoctoral fellows. The Nature Immunology authors address why this function is crucial, how good mentors can be found, and outline the process and benefits -- "a mentor should equip the mentee with the necessary advice and tools to establish themselves as a researcher, while the mentee must be prepared to translate advice into action."
It is perhaps not so intuitively obvious why networking is important. Clearly, it is a useful skill in finding a new job, but as Haynes et al. point out, it is essential to continuing success in all aspects of a career, as it consists of making meaningful, long-lasting contacts to enhance a researcher's visibility in a field where other people are reviewing one's grants and publications, choosing speakers to invite to conferences and seminars, and providing job and award references. The authors write: "new and innovative ways to network have become available to the more technologically savvy researcher. One example is Nature Network, which is an online meeting place for local scientists to gather, talk and find out about the latest scientific news and events in their area. Among other features, the website allows researchers to create personal profiles and set up groups for labs, departments or institutions, and it allows each member to build a network of like-minded scientists."

Update: Corie Lok, Editor of Nature Network, writes here about why networking is good for your career, describing a talk she gave at the New York Academy of Sciences.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code