Nautilus

Ask the Nature editor about all kinds of subjects

One of the longest, and longest-lasting, Nature Network discussions in which I have participated is called “”https://network.nature.com/forums/askthenatureeditor/595?“>High Impact made by famous ones”, started in October 2007 by a graduate student known as “”https://network.nature.com/profile/irna">Universal research" as part of the “”https://network.nature.com/group/askthenatureeditor">Ask the Nature editor" forum.

The forum, incidentally, is hosted by the editors of Nature Network, and is for scientists who want to learn more about getting their work published in Nature and the Nature journals, and about careers in scientific editing, straight from the editors of these journals. You are welcome to join the group and post your questions.

Returning to the discussion thread about those “famous ones”. The Nature and Nature journal editors who regularly handle manuscript submissions provide their answers to a wide range of questions, including whether being well-known or having a stellar track-record is more likely to get your mansucript sent for peer-review or published (answer: no); blinding of the peer-review process (double-blinding gets an airing, but Nature journal editors explain why they feel the system of single-blinding is best for scientists); duplicate publication (or “salami slicing” as it is often known); and independence of editors from those whose work is being considered.

This thread may not be the longest or the oldest that I have ever seen, but it is certainly among the most focused and useful for authors, and I highly recommend you read it for a unique insight into the editors’ thought-processes. If you are at the start of your publishing career as a scientist, you are likely to find this forum very helpful. We welcome you there.

Comments

Comments are closed.