« What's your thinking about cognitive-enhancing drugs? | Main | The week on Nature Network: Friday 12 December »

Bookmark in Connotea

A single author identification system

An international author identification system could allow scientists to receive credit for all their scientific contributions and would solve the problem of identity in a world of limited surnames. This is the premise of an article in the December issue of EMBO Reports (9, 1171-1174; 2008) by Howard Wolinsky. Not a new premise, by any means, but are we any closer to achieving this end? And what are the pros and cons?
Timo Hannay, publishing director of nature.com is quoted in the article: "I'd love a user of Nature.com to be able to click on an author's name and to be able to see a list of everything that we publish by them. And that kind of thing, which seems really trivial, should be very straightforward, but actually isn't because we don't have identifiers associated with them ... We've got a world in which scientists have assigned numbers to all kinds of things: to genes, to species, to stars, to molecules, to the articles they write. The one thing they left out was themselves.....A global author ID does bring you the same benefits that you already have from [a] unique article ID, and you can locate an article very quickly and easily online if you know what its DOI [digital object identifier] is."
The article goes on to describe some of the challenges and complexities of this apparently simple goal (which is, in fact, anything but simple). One issue is whether people would want to assign themselves such a number in principle, given concerns about privacy and possible misuses. Another is the extent of cooperation that would be required by many publishers, databases, institutions and other organizations, as well as the interoperability of their technical systems.
Wolinsky concludes: "In the end, whether an author ID system is a universal database or a connected and compatible network of databases, it has to serve the needs of the scientific community. There is a careful balance to be struck between giving credit where credit is due and knowing everything about everyone. Where that balance lies will be up to the community and those who collaborate to make such a system a reality."

Posted by Maxine Clarke on December 11, 2008
Categories: Authorship | | Comments (1)

Comments

See also:
Aerts R. Digital identifiers work for articles, so why not for authors? Nature 453 (7198) , 979 - 979 (2008) doi: 10.1038/453979b
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7198/full/453979b.html

Posted by: Raf Aerts | December 17, 2008 03:09 PM

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code

Search