« Notes from the Voyage at Second Life | Main | Conference on genetics and genomics of infectious diseases »

Bookmark in Connotea

Nature Immunology on steps to combat plagiarism

The Editorial in the March issue of Nature Immunology (10, 225; 2009) addresses the vexed question of plagiarism: what it is, and what funders are doing about it when it is discovered. From the Editorial:

Publishers, too, are taking steps to combat the rise of plagiarism and to protect the intellectual property rights of their authors. Internet-based search tools have been developed to detect potential cases of plagiarism. Online publication has also facilitated the creation of a textual database, called 'CrossRef', where published content can be deposited and annotated by various 'meta tags'. Nature Publishing Group and over 40 other publishers, as participating members of CrossRef, routinely deposit published papers into this database. In 2008, the developers of CrossRef also launched a service called CrossCheck, which uses the iThenticate Internet-based tool developed by iParadigms to compare a selected paper with the entire database to assess textual similarity. Akin to a search of a protein or nucleic acid database, textual similarity scores are reported after the search program is run, and the context of the similarity can be displayed so that the user (in this case, an editor) can further inspect those manuscripts deemed 'suspect'. The incorporation of such tools into the normal editorial workflow should help diminish the likelihood of plagiarism in manuscripts that might otherwise have passed peer review. Nature Publishing Group journals will be using this tool to scrutinize manuscripts selected for publication.
Still, the onus is on mentors and laboratory chiefs to serve as examples of good scientific conduct. They should initiate discussions about what constitutes plagiarism and 'self plagiarism', as well as other forms of misconduct, with their trainees. Mentors should recognize their obligation to help trainees to develop and hone good written communication skills that follow high ethical standards. Likewise, colleagues, referees and editors all must accept their responsibility to safeguard scientific literature against the possibility of plagiarism or dual publication. Scientific integrity includes the ability to acknowledge good ideas and to give proper credit due to original authors.

The Nature journals' policies on plagiarism are here.

The Nature journals' policies on duplicate publication are here.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code