« Only one way to measure scientific achievement | Main | NSMB on US visa procedures for scientists »

Bookmark in Connotea

What's on nature.com blogs: June 09

Here's a summmary of some posts from nature.com staff blogs over the past month or so that might be of interest to scientists as authors, communicators and peer reviewers:

In the Field: Reports from the World Science Festival in New York.

The Great Beyond: Scientists strike back at pseudoscience.

Sceptical Chymist: Q/As with Aaron Wright and with Ian Fleming.

Methagora: Nature Methods top downloads for May.

The Great Beyond: New element needs a name.

Indigenus: Western concerns about climate don’t help vulnerable populations.

Sceptical Chymist: end of the cookbook laboratory.

Nascent: Welcome to the streamosphere. And here is a Streamosphere update (7 July).

Methagora: Cover error?

The Niche: Stem cell trial to go ahead in India.

In the Field: Following the Apollo 11 moon landing in real-time - 40 years on, and reporting on the World Conference of Science Journalists.

The Niche: Chief scientific officer leaves regenerative medicine intsitute.

Climate Feedback: Reporting the 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate meeting.

Sceptical Chymist: Blogging and Twittering from the 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate meeting.

Nascent: "I am not a scientist, I am a number".

Previous nature.com blogs round-ups.

Posted by Maxine Clarke on July 08, 2009
Categories: nature.com blogs | | Comments (0)

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code

Search