« Five years on for the Allen Brain Atlas | Main | Goodbye from Nature Reports Stem Cells »

Bookmark in Connotea

Nature special: Climate of compromise

The road to Copenhagen. With the UN Climate Change Conference just six weeks away, Nature this week (22 October issue) assesses how much - or little - progress is being made on tackling climate change in a set of Opinion articles and News Features, all free to read online for one month from the date of issue, as well as an Editorial (free to read online). The latest round of negotations shows that the gulf between rich and poor nations is as great as ever, and hopes of a strong agreement are rapidly fading. Raúl Estrada-Oyuela, a diplomat who guided the Kyoto negotiations, argues that success in Copenhagen will depend on the skills of the lead negotiator (Nature 461, 1056-1057; 2009) Meanwhile, Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, comments on the Indian negotiation stance (p. 1054), while Jiahua Pan, of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, examines the Chinese perspective on reducing global emissions (p. 1055) . A pair of news features take us around the world to look at efforts to adapt to climate change in Bhutan (pp 1042- 1046), and a project in Peru to monitor forest carbon (pp 1048-1052).
Successful international negotiations share some important characteristics with scientific research, argues an Editorial this week (Nature 461, 1027-1028; 2009). Both are iterative processes, in which results from one step help to determine the path forward. They require time and perseverance. And they rarely travel in a straight line. Countries should endeavour to build on the positive actions of the past year, both before and after the Copenhagen summit.
See also: more articles, the free Nature podcast and more online extras.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited. Remember this blog is for feedback and discussion of matters concerning scientific authorship or peer-review - not for drawing attention to your research.

If you want to know if a NPG journal would be interested in your research, you will need to contact the journal's editorial office, which can be done via the authors & referees website.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'authors at nature dot com'.

please enter code