News blog

Human hunters off the hook? Climate change caused wooly mammoths’ extinction, say scientists.

Woolly mammoth.JPG

Climate change, rather than human hunters, drove the wooly mammoth to extinction. That’s the claim from scientists who say that the hairy beasts lost their grazing grounds as forests rapidly replaced grasslands after the last ice age, roughly 20,000 years ago.

The researchers used palaeoclimate and vegetation models to simulate the plant cover across the mammoths’ habitat around that time. And the results are striking. “The landscape at the last glacial maximum would have been dominated by grasses and small shrubs and bushes, a perfect vegetation for mammoths and other megafaunal grazers,” explains Judy Allen, a palaeoecologist at Durham University, UK and lead author of the study. “But as the climate warmed, the mammoths habitat of grassland was completely taken over by forest,” she says. The tree takeover was boosted by more intense sunlight and higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. (see BBC and Daily Telegraph).

Not only did this change happen across a vast area covering modern day Europe and North America, it also happened very fast. “We’re talking about a warming over a 2,000 to 5,000 year period,” says Brian Huntley, a Durham palaeoecologist and co-author of the study. “In just a few thousand years the mammoth’s habitat and food source more or less disappeared”. The research is published in <a href=“https://www.sciencedirect.com/science?ob=ArticleURL&udi=B6VBC-50HN7J5-5&user=906544&coverDate=09%2F30%2F2010&rdoc=1&fmt=high&_orig=search&sort=d&docanchor=&view=c&acct=C000047747&version=1&urlVersion=0&userid=906544&md5=58416dead157c9d3187318687ddacd58”Quaternary Science Reviews.

But why didn’t the mammoths just adapt? “It took a couple of millions of years for the mammoth lineage to evolve through to the woolly mammoths adapted to the cold and grassland conditions,” says Huntley. “A few thousand years would be insufficient time for a large animal like the mammoth with slow regeneration time to adapt quick enough.”

In fact, the woolly mammoth’s mouthparts were specially adapted for feeding on grass, with studies showing that it had evolved into two groups by around 40,000 years ago (see ‘Woolly mammoth family tree grows a new branch’).

Yet humans aren’t quite off the hook. “Our results show that a warming climate about 20,000 years ago would have put a lot of environmental stress on mammoths and other megafauna,” says Allen. “But there is no doubt that humans hunted mammoths. And as the climate warmed, human hunting may have led to the final demise of an already environmentally stressed species.”

The author is a British Science Association Media Fellow.

Image: Natural History Museum

Comments

  1. Report this comment

    Oliver said:

    What puzzles me is that in all the media coverage I’ve seen on this, no one asks why the current interglacial should have been so much worse for mammoths than previous interglacials, which they came through fine.

  2. Report this comment

    Kate Larkin said:

    You are right that the mammoth lineage did survive through many shifts in the climate from Ice Ages (glacials), to warmer periods (interglacials). Brian Huntley, a co-author on the Quaternary Science Review paper says there are two main reasons we need to bear in mind to answer your question. Firstly, not every interglacial is the same. Orbital forcing is never quite the same nor are the prevailing conditions of the preceding glacial. And each successive interglacial has had a characteristic but different sequence of vegetation. Secondly, although the last interglacial (~ 120,000 years ago) appears to have been warmer than the Holocene, this does not translate automatically into a greater extent of forest. The fossil record indicates that a large area of eastern Siberia that in the Holocene became covered by Boreal forest, remained as open, largely treeless, steppic grassland vegetation with only scattered or sparse woody taxa during the last interglacial. There are also fossil remains of Woolly Mammoth and other species adapted to the ‘tundra=steppe’ biome in the interglacial deposits from that region – indeed the glacial and last interglacial faunas differ rather little there. For more information please refer to the following references:

    1. Sher, A. (1997) Late-Quaternary extinction of large mammals in northern Eurasia: A new look at the Siberian contribution. Past and future rapid environmental changes: The spatial and evolutionary responses of terrestrial biota. NATO ASI Series I: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 47, pp. 319-339. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

Comments are closed.