News blog

Animal genomes riddled with the ‘skeletons’ of ancient viruses

ebola240.jpg

It’s time for animals – including humans – to admit that the bacteria, viruses and other microbes have won. Our bodies are home to many times more bacterial cells than animal cells and countless trillions of viruses. Ancient retroviruses make up a good size chunk of our genome. Now, scientists have discovered that most any virus can set up shop in an animal’s genomes and lay dormant for millions of years.

A scan of 44 mammal genomes, plus those of several mosquito and tick vectors and two birds that could serve as reservoirs, has uncovered DNA sequences that can be traced to 10 different families of viruses, including some related to viruses that cause hepatitis B, Ebola, rabies and dengue. Most of the viral sequences are riddled with enough mutations to be considered junk, but some appear to encoding working genes co-opted by their host. The work is published online today in the journal PLoS Genetics.


It’s not obvious how all these viruses got into animal genomes. The researchers, Aris Katzourakis at the University of Oxford, UK, and Robert Gifford at Rockefeller University in New York, searched specifically for viruses that aren’t retroviruses, which are obligated to copy their DNA into hosts. Many but not all of the viruses infect their hosts persistently or replicate inside of the nucleus, however, offering ample opportunity to take up residence in the genomes of germ cells.

The work is just a first look at all the non-retroviruses in the animal genome, but Katzourakis and Gifford turned up a few interesting findings. For instance, their scan identified sequences from filoviruses, the family Ebola belongs to, in the genomes of bats, tarsiers, several rodents, opossums and even wallabies. This hints that filoviruses have a much wider host range than the primate and bat species which these viruses are known to infect.

The paper also hints at unknown ancient transmissions of viruses between hosts. The bottlenose dolphin genome, it turns out, is home to sequences of a kind of parvovirus similar to one found in birds, suggesting that the viruses may have jumped between mammals and birds in the past.

Most of these sequences are junk, so filled with mutations that they can’t make working proteins. But some of the viral sequences might do something inside their hosts. One example is a bornavirus gene called EBLN-1 that took up residence in ancient primate genomes some 50 million years ago and survives intact in many modern primates, including humans. A similar protein latches onto RNA in bornaviruses, so it might do the same in primates as part of a viral defence mechanism, Gifford speculates.

Like the ancient retroviruses locked inside animal genomes, these viruses offer a window into infections that occurred millions of years ago.

“People who are looking at the ecology of those diseases, they very much work in recent time and they have no assumptions that it’s an old system that might have evolved over billions of years,” says Gifford. “The data that we’re finding is really contradicting that and providing the first evidence that these are really old relationships between hosts and viruses, and I think it’s really critical to how we underestand them to get that context right.”

Image: colour-enhanced micrograph of Ebola virus courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Comments

  1. Chris Carter said:

    This is a key paper with major implications. Hundreds of viruses appear to have infiltrated the human genome. The important consequence of this is that the proteins

    of today’s viruses resemble our own. Numerous BLASTs of translated viral DNA vs.the human proteome are shown at this site named Pandora’s

    box for obvious reasons. Small contigous amino acid stretches of 5 or more amino acids within human proteins exactly match those in the current virome (Vatches = viral matches).

    Upon infection these viral proteins are likely to seed havoc within the host’s protein networks, acting as dummy ligands, decoy receptors or by interactome interference. This has major implications for understanding how viruses contribute to disease and several examples are shown.For example it

    would appear that such viral insertions,repeated over evolutionary time, are

    responsible for the creation of gene families. HSV-1 and HSV-2 are homologous to many kinases,

    and the cytomegalovirus to many chemokine receptors.

    The viruses implicated as risk factors in Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease all express proteins that are homologous to hundreds

    of susceptibity gene products in these diseases.This suggests that genes and risk factors act together, and that each may be a risk factor precisely because of such matches. In addition, given such homology at both the DNA and protein level, it is likely that some gene association studies, using blood samples, have been

    indexing infection as well as identifying key susceptibility genes.

    Some of these observations are available at NaturePrecedings

  2. Jen said:

    This is interesting news. Just the other day I saw an Internet article (I forget the source unfortunately) which mentioned that a retrovirus in human DNA may be responsible for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and multiple sclerosis. This retrovirus is only “set off” if the person carrying it is infected with influenza or toxoplasmosis either in the womb or very early in life, otherwise it remains dormant. The retrovirus is thought to have infected a primate ancestor of all humans and monkeys about 55-60 million years ago.

  3. Jim Lindelien said:

    All this suggests a new product idea. That one can record brief messages into one’s DNA and pass them on down the line to one’s future generations as your distilled wisdom for the ages. Just use two nucleotide bases for each ASCII character (and hope the resulting sequence doesn’t foster cancer). What message would you send, if you could?

  4. Terence Hale said:

    Hi,

    Animal genomes riddled with the ‘skeletons’ of ancient viruses –

    November 18, 2010: A scan of 44 mammal genomes.

    Interpretation must be taken with care as the open reading frame

    and software used determines the result. Another important factor

    is the start and end of a comparative sequence. The telomere does

    this with the chromosomes.

    Regards Dr. Terence Hale

    Report this comment Cancel report
    Your details

    Please confirm the words below

    In order to reduce spamming, this process ensures you are a real person and not an automated program.

Comments are closed.