News blog

UNESCO deals another blow to ocean fertilization hopes

Using ocean fertilization to fight global warming has little chance of success, an independent group of experts concludes in a report released today.

plankton.jpg

Scientists first suggested in the late 1980s that adding iron or other nutrients to nutrient-poor ocean regions might stimulate blooms of photosynthesising algae. They reasoned that the growing algae would remove substantial amounts of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, so slowing the rate of global warming.

But the scheme is unlikely to work, according to an expert group commissioned by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), which is part of UNESCO. In a 17-page summary for policymakers of recent scientific findings, the group concludes that even very large-scale ocean fertilization would remove only modest amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.


The effects of ocean fertilization have been tested during several experiments carried out over the last decade. Then in 2008, rising concerns over possibly harmful ecological effects saw the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) call for a moratorium on all fertilization activities until a global regulatory mechanism was in place.

The UNESCO report, compiled to inform the parties to the London Convention – an international treaty to prevent marine pollution – is now set to be another nail in the coffin of what once seemed a promising way to tackle climate change.

“It’s vastly more complex than assessing carbon storage in a forest,” says Doug Wallace of the Leibniz Institute for Marine Sciences (IFM-GEOMAR) in Kiel, Germany, who chaired the IOC expert group. “The carbon, and many of the potential impacts, are largely invisible and likely to be spread over vast distances.”

Experts are discussing ecosystem impacts ocean fertilization and other proposed geoengineering schemes at a symposium today at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California. The symposium can be watched live online.

Image: Iron-induced plankton bloom. Alfred Wegener Institute of Polar and Marine Research.

Comments

  1. Report this comment

    Alex said:

    So the UN has recognised that ocean fertilisation could have potentially harmful ecological effects, and therefore following the precautionary principle, it should be suspended for now.

    Meanwhile, the UN’s International Seabed Authority has decided that mining deep-sea hydrothermal vents, where ecological impacts are equally unknown but potentially harmful, is just fine and dandy. And so they are pressing ahead to approve China’s application to explore mineral deposits along 1000 km of the SW Indian Ridge.

    When it comes to the precautionary principle, some joined up thinking from the various bodies of the UN would be too much to hope for, I suppose.

  2. Report this comment

    MS Bhatti said:

    Any pratice that does not yield results in the favour of ecological balance should be banned once for all. The scientists will have to come up with new economical eco-engineering schemes to save the marine life from external and internal threats.

    A vast amount of minerals and useful salts is present in the seabed. There is a need to explore the sea, so that the outcome of ocean fertilization might be studied.

Comments are closed.