« LPSC: Bloggers at the conference | Main | Supercomputer builds a virus »

Comet chasers get mineral shock

Stardust mission yields white hot results.

The first results from a mission to catch dust from a comet's tail have revealed a surprise: these balls of dirty snow are born of fire as well as ice. Scientists were stunned to find a huge range of minerals in the particles captured by NASA's Stardust probe as it swooped past the comet Wild 2 on 2 January 2004. Many of the compounds could only have formed close to a star - far from the chilly outskirts of the Solar System where the comet first coalesced.

Read the news@nature.com story (you'll need a password) here.
And see all blog entries from the conference here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/334

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Comet chasers get mineral shock:

» Minerals from Minerals
student. Photomicrography and website design by Kent Ratajeski, UNC Ph.D. Antimony is used as a hardenin... [Read More]

» Minerals from Minerals
ofRevett Minerals Reports on 2005 Full Year Results Business Wire (press release CA 15 hours ago used a net of approximately $1.6 million in cash ... [Read More]

» Minerals from Minerals
student. Photomicrography and website design by Kent Ratajeski, UNC Ph.D. Antimony is used as a hardening alloy ... [Read More]

Comments

I was the first person to publish a refereed paper that suggested the solar nebula was processed by a solar bipolar outflow. Michael Brown and I also predicted, over 10 years ago, that a major proportion of solar nebula dust would be processed in the inner nebula and then ejected by an outflow to the outer parts of the nebula (see section 6 of the paper at http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602383 ).

The recent stardust results do not prove that our ideas are/were correct, but they are certainly consistent with the general theory that we have outlined.
Sincerely, Kurt Liffman
CSIRO/MIT

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.