« Magnets zap migraines | Main | Brain ‘traffic jams’ drive Parkinson’s symptoms »

Oldest known jewellery discovered

Beads made from shells represent earliest personal adornment.

It can take hundreds of beads to make a single bracelet, and thousands for a haute couture gown. But it has taken only three shell beads to shake up our theories about human evolution.

Read more here

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/775

Comments

This article is really one more element supporting an analysis I made concerning the continuity of Human Culture development. I have posted the first draft in the Forum PALANTH and then refined this analysis on my own webpage under the title:
"Radical or progressive evolution? The case of “Savant syndrome”."
(January 2004, revised january 2005)

Along the continuous evolution of human culture, my hypothesis is that there were exceptionnal talents expressing themselves sporadically. Just like thoughout history: a few extraordinary personnalities trancend the ambiant culture, producing art that is "outside" the main stream".

The article by Vanhaeren M., et al. definitely shows that human culture evolved since a very long period before the European upper palaetlothic marvels of Chauvet or Vogelheart, circa 32 K years BP.

I'd be interested to have comments on my analysis.

(http://pagesperso.laposte.net/autismeprehistoire/art_evolution_or_revolution.htm)

Paul TREHIN

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.