« More cats found with bird flu | Main | Baked scorpions solve fossil puzzle »

Transgenic cotton drives insect boom

Secondary pests could undermine initial benefits of Bt cotton.

After 7 years of planting cotton genetically engineered to kill bollworms, other insects have boomed so much on Chinese farms that their owners are losing money.

Read the story here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/916

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Transgenic cotton drives insect boom:

» Cotton from Cotton
manufactured cotton products through activities that affect cotton, cottonseed and U.S. CCIs missio... [Read More]

Comments

Human always kill other species for their own benefit.But who care about the insect,the so-called pest's living?
I do not think it is a good idea that we produce a second genetation plant to kill the other pest.Many years later,do we need the 3rd,4th...GM plants to kill all the insects on our planet?

even in india the bt cotton crop has ruined the farmers. thus the great success is now proving as an economic and scientific failure

All endeavors, such as GM crops, have risk/benefit ratios. Every GM crop must be assessed individually in this regard, but the particular must not be generalized (i.e.: to all GM crops).

All endeavors, such as GM crops, have risk/benefit ratios. Every GM crop must be assessed individually in this regard, but the particular must not be generalized (i.e.: to all GM crops).

This is a problem with a past,similar problems have occured when plants have been introduced to an enviroment not native to them in an effort to eradicate another problem species,I dont think any such efforts have had expected outcomes usually causing more harm than good.Seems like Gm pushers are blinded to the facts by
£/$.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.