« US elections: Unhappy hour for the GOP | Main | Power up your memory bank »

US elections: Heating up in Missouri

Things are really looking tight in Missouri, where state auditor Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, is running against incumbent senator Jim Talent for a seat in the US Senate. Many pollsters are tipping the race as the tightest of all Senate races for this election. That, in turn, makes it key for control of the Senate as a whole; if the Democrats pick up six seats in the Senate, they will have a majority and control the chamber. Pretty much everyone expects the Democrats to win back a majority in the other chamber of Congress, the House of Representatives, but the Senate still appears to be up for grabs.

Like a college student, McCaskill has pulled an all-nighter of campaigning. Early this morning she was stumping for votes in 24-hour diners across Missouri. Her opponent, meanwhile, is getting only slightly more sleep, and yesterday hosted President Bush in a campaign stop.

While the Senate race itself is neck-and-neck, Missouri's ballot initiative to protect embryonic stem cell research is looking in better shape. Polls suggest that the initiative is likely to pass, which would make any embryonic stem-cell research that is legal under federal laws also legal in Missouri. It sounds like a no-brainer, but it's meant to stave off recent challenges by conservatives in the state legislature who want to impose stricter limits on such research.

Looks like it will be a long night in Missouri next Tuesday.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1410

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.