« AGU: The crowds keep coming | Main | ASCB: Evolution: The gloves come off »

AGU: The hockey stick, redux

First up on my slate this morning was a session on paleoclimate temperature reconstructions for the past millennium. This, of course, involves the famous 'hockey stick' reconstruction showing that temperatures in the 20th century were unequalled in the past 1,000 years. That, of course, is according to paleoclimatologist Michael Mann, his coauthors, and a National Academy of Sciences study that broadly reaffirmed their findings earlier this year.

It's always fun to be in the same room with Mann and his chief antagonist, Steve McIntyre. McIntyre, a mineral exploration consultant from Canada, has spent years working to debunk Mann's hockey stick graph and its implications. Earlier this year, both spent an afternoon at the NAS presenting their respective sides of the argument to the panel of assembled experts. Mann left the room without giving McIntyre so much as a glance.

Sadly, there were no new fireworks today. Mann spent much of McIntyre's talk looking down at his lap and shaking his head. And McIntyre sat back down after his talk without even arguing with the other critics in the audience. Could it be finally true? Has the community actually moved on? Will we ever have to hear about hockey sticks ever again?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1604

Comments

For what it's worth, McIntyre blogs it here, and another blogger chimes in here

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.