« AU summit: a good night for science | Main | Prion disease reversed in mice »

AU summit: final thoughts

Readers following the AU summit on national TV news could be forgiven for wondering if the event on their screens is the same as that being described in this blog and on the pages of SciDev.Net.

It 'was' exactly the same event, only my colleagues from the broadcast media who came to Addis in their hundreds mostly ignored the discussions on science and climate change. They focused instead on conflicts: conflicts between heads of state for top jobs in the AU; conflicts between Ethiopia and Somalia, in Sudan and even in Rwanda where the country wants to heal and move on from the genocide.

This is not to say that Africa is conflict-free. But that the clips on our TV screens did not reflect the bulk of what was discussed at the AU this week, nor did the broadcasts convey much of a sense that Africa is on the move -- the overwhelming impression that delegates went home with. This week's summit showed that a confident and emboldened AU (with its planned new parliament and court of human rights) will be key to the continent's future. It is unfortunate that many viewers and listeners inside and outside Africa will never know, because broadcasters chose to turn their cameras elsewhere.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1820

Comments

I am very glad to say that the news was not 'all bad'. BBC Africa Have Your Say did a show called 'Where are Africa's scientists'. We were delighted to be joined live from the AU meeting by a representative from the African Union. The programme also featured innovative research on treating HIV/Aids from Uganda, a science teacher from a highschool in Freetown, Sierra Leone and a Malawian astrophysics student from the University of Southern California. I think it was understandable that the situation in Somalia would overshadow all the good news about science. But our programme demonstrates a willingness not to go for the easy hit.

Good news

thank you for informations.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.