« Violin makers can't pick out good wood | Main | Tests for heart-disease risk could be misleading »

Stardust samples genuine, researchers say

Fears of contamination in comet collection may be overblown.

Recent media reports that certain comet samples returned by the Stardust mission may simply be contamination have been overblown, say researchers.

Read the story here.

Posted by Nicola Jones on April 10, 2007
Categories: | | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2273

Comments

I agree, media reports of contamination of Stardust samples are overblown - probably backlash to the finding that comets contain ordinary material that came from the Sun.

We experienced a similar backlash when we reported that the elements trapped in iron sulfide (FeS) from meteorites had isotope compositions like those found in planets rich in iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) - Earth and Mars [Nature 299 (1982) 807-810].

Reports of analysis from the Stardust mission to a comet were intellectually more honest than reports from most of NASA's other missions.

In 1969 NASA first overlooked and then tried to suppress evidence in samples from the Apollo MIssion that the Sun is a plasma diffuser, selectively moving light elements and lightweight isotopes of each element to the solar surface.

http://tinyurl.com/3ydcql

The Genesis Mission promised to tell us the composition of the Sun. I had great hopes that NASA was going to "come clean." But little or nothing of value came from the Genesis Mission.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
www.omatumr.com

Posted by: Oliver K. Manuel | May 12, 2007 08:16 AM

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.

Search