« Everest: The rest before the final push. | Main | How geology came to help Alexander the Great »

Burning wood to power fridges

Project aims to bring high-tech device to developing world.

A consortium of UK universities hopes to bring affordable domestic appliances to rural areas of developing countries by developing a device that acts as a refrigerator, cooker and power generator all in one, powered by locally available biomass fuels such as wood.

Read the story here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2553

Comments

Fantastic idea

Won't burning more wood have a negative effect on global warming ? Or at least, won't it increase deforestation ?
Especially if it invites people to burn wood constantly, so that their fridge keeps cool (a warm fridge being useless) ?
Or have I misunderstood the process ?

While the effort to bring refrigeration technology to remote locations is laudable, wood burning cookstoves are not only a major source of carbon, but a leading cause of desertfication in the Sahel and most of Asia.

A simple clay jar filled with water can, through the proccess of evaporation, extend the life of perishables more efficiently. It is also "locally available" technology.

The developing world deserves a better effort than this, which invites the waste of more natural resources.

Just because you "can", doesn't mean you "should".

That's what led us into the mess in the first place. ( global wawrming)

Jean Novak,

Chandler, AZ

It is rather disappointing that they're using wood burning as the energy source, but remember two things.

One is that people insist on flames for cooking. Solar cookers, for instance, didn't get adopted widely because their cooking characteristics were too different from what people were used to. (Same thing for those of us who hate electric stoves and insist on gas.) Until there's a locally acceptable substitute for wood, maybe it's just as well to get more functions out of the ergs produced.

Two is that the design could probably be easily adapted to use other energy sources for refrigeration, such as solar heat. That would work better since the heat is more continuous, and present right when the cooling needs are greatest.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.