« Nature Podcast 12 Jul 2007 | Main | Bears build up what fish flush out »

Allergic reactions more common in north

US study finds link between location and anaphylaxis.

Potentially lethal allergic reactions are much more common in the northern United States than in the south, researchers have found. What links geography and allergy is unknown, but the team behind the discovery suggests that sunlight might be a factor.

Read the story here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3033

Comments

Could it be that people in the north spend more time inside for more months of the year than their southern cousins? Perhaps they are affected by the off-gassing of the many chemical cleaners in their homes, or any new furnishing that have dyes and finishes that off-gas. Could they grill more indoors (stove top)? Could they be using more teflon treated pots and pans? The only way to get fumes out of the home is to open all the doors and windows, and this is more likely just real common in warm climates.

One possible explanation for a latitude gradient for anaphylaxis could
be access to microorganisms by means of access to locally grown fresh
produce. Northern consumers may rely more heavily on processed foods
with lower levels of viable organisms to which the immune system would
react.

Thank you,


jvh


John Van Herwynen, Fermentation Scientist

If lethal allergic reactions are increasing as a whole and they are potentially linked to vitamin D deficiencies, could the rise in stronger sunscreens and an active campaign to prevent skin cancer explain this increase in severe allergic reactions?

This is an intriguing observation, and one way or another might also explain why more kids today have autoimmune disorders (e.g., asthma) than previously. It seems that kids spend more time indoors today than they used to. Either enhanced exposure to indoor 'sensitizing' agents, as suggested by N. Liquorman, or exposure to something beneficial outdoors (e.g., vitamin D generation), might be part of this equation...

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.