« Manic mood swings can destroy grey matter | Main | Liquids bounce again »

The man with a hole in his brain

Scans reveal a fluid-filled cavity in the brain of a normal man

Three years ago, a 44-year-old man was admitted to hospital in Marseille, France, complaining of weakness in his left leg. He had no idea what doctors would find to be the source of the problem: a huge pocket of fluid where most of his brain ought to be.

read the story here

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3084

Comments

This case is certainly not unique. There was a BBC Panorama programme, circa 1978, about a bunch of children who had drainage valves installed to counter hydrocephalis in the early 1960s. With the advent of CAT scans, they were re-examined. The brightest of them was reading maths at Oxford, and had 10% of normal brain volume, just like the guy in the article. His visual centres got reused for doing sums when his eyes were closed!

I recall seeing a similar, but perhaps even more striking story on the Annenberg Channel: http://www.learner.org/vod/vod_window.html?pid=1575 .
I am curious about what experts say about these reports.

The Anneberg Channel video was very interesting. Timestamps on the UK CAT scans are in 1980, matching the mother's smock dress, and the era of the Panorama programme. The HP inkjet printer and mixed floppy drives in the US case suggest late 1980s.

It looks like this phenomenon was discovered 30 years ago, explored for 10 years, and then forgotten! I've seen other cases which suggest that the focus on administration and grant cycles has displaced the pursuit of knowledge, such that science is currently moving backwards.

yes the Brits were on top of this...2cm of cortex found patients functional

i was told in oct 2006 i had a hole in my brain by a neuo.dr. and he said i don't know what caused that and that was it. no more test and would not talk about it. how scare is that!!!!!! anybody can help me.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.