« First ‘tall gene’ found | Main | Local livestock breeds at risk »

High hopes for new schizophrenia drugs

Drug trial hailed as first major breakthrough for 50 years.

Psychiatrists have welcomed the unveiling by a US drug company of the first new class of schizophrenia drugs since the 1950s.

Read more here

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3365

Comments

First advance since 1952??

What happened to all the "atypical" drugs supposed similar?

IF/when released just another bogus profit for Lilly.

The news story contains some significant errors. First, current antipsychotics work by acting as antagonists at dopamine receptors, not by reducing the amount of dopamine. Second, the action of PCP was glutamate receptor antagonism, and the new drug described here acts as a glutamate receptor agonist. These are basic pharmacologic facts that a Nature reporter should get right, I'm afraid.

The new Lilly compound has a sophisticated pharmacology. It acts as an agonist at presynaptic receptors which results in a reduction in the amount of glutamate released presynaptically, thus effectively capping glutamate tone. Pharmacologists realised that the glutamate system could be a useful target for schizophrenia because disrupting it with PCP resulted in psychosis.

But it is true that antipsychotics don’t reduce absolute levels of dopamine – by acting as antagonists at post-synaptic receptors, they reduce the dopaminergic tone. Atypical antipyschotics also act at serotonergic receptors which may contribute to their better therapeutic profiles.

This is perhaps a minor issue, but I'm wondering on what grounds olanzapine is being described as the "best" anti-psychotic. My reading of CATIE was that olanzapine was the one patients stayed on the longest, not that there was any marked difference between them.
While it seems cynical to point it out, I can't help but notice that this is a new Lilly drug, as is olanzapine.

Geodon has a neutral weight gain profile.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.