Nature Newsblog
« Emerging tech: not yet diggin it? | Main | Stone tool reveals lengthy Polynesian voyage »
Study reveals valuable store of ancient DNA in museum samples.
Geneticists have pieced together gene sequences from ten Siberian mammoths, using tiny samples of their hair found preserved in the Russian tundra. The result uses some of the oldest DNA ever pieced together — one of the mammoths had lain in the frozen ground for some 50,000 years.
Posted by Nicola Jones on September 27, 2007
Categories: | Permalink
| Comments (27)
| TrackBacks (0)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3584
Subscribe to this blog's feeds:
Comments
Its an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells in them. I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts.
Posted by: Alokmay Behera | September 28, 2007 12:15 PM
Following publication of this interesting result in popular media we can expect that anti-science creationists will insist that this "proves" that the earth is actually young.
This has been our experience following the publication of other projects recovering organic remnants form ancient sources. For a discussion and refutations of creationist misrepresentation of this sort of work see Ancient Molecules Modern Myths, or Dino Blood Redux.
I recommend that all researchers in molecular paleontology become familiar with creationist abuse of their work, and be prepared to debunk anti-science claims.
Posted by: Gary Hurd | October 1, 2007 03:57 PM
hey what is the proof that it is not the DNA of any other organism attched or same DNA srech...we have to be emore cautious taking these reoprts very seriously.
Posted by: gunjan arora | October 1, 2007 07:55 PM
Gary Hurd may be right in that such findings will delight creationists and strengthen their beliefs. I, for one, find it incomprehensible why biological findings keep contradicting scientific, i.e. evolutionary, dogmas and expectations. Of course, the researchers may doubt the theoretical models of DNA decay, but isn't that similar to what creationists do when they doubt long-age models?
The data as they are presented to us over the past 5-10 years are not in line with chemical and fysical expectation. Either chemistry and fysics are wrong or the dating techniques. Or both?
Posted by: peter borger, PhD | October 2, 2007 11:46 AM
hey what is the proof that it is not the DNA of any other organism attched or same DNA srech...we have to be emore cautious taking these reoprts very seriously.
Posted by: seo yarışması | October 5, 2007 09:05 AM
Its an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells in them. I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts.
Posted by: www.r10.net seo yarışması | November 5, 2007 03:23 PM
an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells
Posted by: küresel ısınmaya hayır | November 5, 2007 03:31 PM
Why dont you do it in other languages.
Posted by: çanta | November 12, 2007 08:59 PM
Its an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells in them. I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts....
Posted by: kale kapı | November 14, 2007 10:31 PM
ts an indeed good attempt to procure DNA sex shop form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells in them. I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts.
Posted by: sex shop | November 14, 2007 10:41 PM
Although it sounds really interesting, I couldn't read the full story, unfortunately.
Posted by: www küresel ısınmaya hayır | November 15, 2007 09:30 AM
The data as they are presented to us over the past 5-10 years are not in line with chemical and fysical expectation
Posted by: Geciktirici | November 27, 2007 11:21 PM
I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts.
Posted by: www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması | December 30, 2007 11:57 PM
How can they do it. I have never understood it and I will never understand...
Posted by: Evrak çantası | January 2, 2008 06:03 PM
an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells...
Posted by: program indir | January 4, 2008 07:32 AM
i agree with him . "I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts."
Posted by: araba | January 13, 2008 05:16 AM
This has been our experience following the publication of other projects recovering organic remnants form ancient sources.
Posted by: cep telefonu | January 20, 2008 08:17 AM
an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells...
Posted by: çocuk oyunları | March 9, 2008 07:15 PM
I’m sure it’s obvious to you, Sebastian, that success in any language including Esperanto is down to the individual learner.
As you well know, because of its regularity and its powerful word-building rules, Esperanto is far more easily mastered than any national language, apart, perhaps, for Indonesian.
It seems clear to me that Margot is an individual who possesses the capability and dedication to achieve a high level of proficiency in Esperanto particularly if she spent as much time on it as she spends on English. This was the essential point of my posting, a point which you seem to have deliberately ignored.
The only doubt about Margot is not her capability, but her intent. The same may also be said about you.
Posted by: canlı tv | May 22, 2008 04:09 AM
I Although it sounds really interesting,oo I couldn't read the full story, unfortunately.
Posted by: Çanta | June 1, 2008 10:20 PM
Its an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells in them. I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts....
Posted by: hikaye | July 29, 2008 08:02 AM
agree with him . "I don't understand how can the group of scientists can procure DNA from these dead parts."
Posted by: sikiş | August 4, 2008 06:55 AM
an indeed good attempt to procure DNA form hairs. But i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells...
Posted by: porno izle | August 15, 2008 04:12 PM
very interesting story :o
Posted by: Mesut Kose | December 12, 2008 04:08 PM
merhaba arkadaşlar ben okulumda olacak bi münazaraa seçildim konumuz küresel ısınmanın nedeni doğadır karşı grup ise küresel ısınmanın nedeni ınsandır tezini savunacak ben de açıkçası insam diyorum ama konu böle geldi nasıl bi savunma yapabiliriz yardımcı olursanız çok sevinirim şimdiden teşekkürler
Posted by: odaoyunlari | December 12, 2008 04:57 PM
This was the essential point of my posting, a point which you seem to have deliberately ignored.
Posted by: promosyon çanta | January 22, 2009 02:20 PM
i have a conceptual doubt over it. Hairs are dead parts and grow from the hair follicles. They dont have any living cells in them.
Posted by: Red | January 26, 2009 10:06 PM