« AAS: Planets, planets everywhere | Main | AAS: How astronomers die »

AAS: Seeing double

Sometimes a picture can be more profound than it looks. This unassuming black-and-white image shows something never seen before – a double ‘Einstein ring’ created by a chance cosmic alignment.

einsteinring.jpg

Look closely – you should see not only a bright, nearly circular ring, but also fainter, interrupted arcs of light outside it. That second concentric ring is what makes it a double Einstein ring.

The regular Einstein rings are pretty cool in themselves. They’re optical illusions of a sort, created when light from a distant object (like a galaxy) gets bent by the gravity of a second object that lies along the line of sight between us and the first object. Tommaso Treu, of the University of California Santa Barbara, likens it to holding up a wine glass and looking at a candle through its stem; the distortions in the glass smear out the candle flame into arc-like shapes.

There are only about 50 regular Einstein rings known to date, and Treu and his colleagues were recently hunting for more. And that’s when they stumbled across the double ring. The geometry is complicated: first there’s us; then, 3 billion light-years away, the ‘lens’ which is some object like a massive galaxy; then, 6 billion light-years away, another galaxy whose light has been smeared by the lens to create the inner, bright ring; and finally, 11 billion light-years away, the galaxy whose light has been similarly smeared into the outer, fainter arcs.

It’s a rare alignment, but Treu thinks there may be more out there. Future space missions could potentially spot as many as 50 of the double rings, he says. And with that, astronomers might be able to use the rings to start answering questions about how matter and energy is distributed throughout the universe.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4252

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.