« LPSC: She seeks the grail | Main | LPSC: Loco for la Luna »

APS 2008: Crumpled balls

aluminum1.gif Some physics experiments are just patently fun -- the science seems to sneak in by stealth, changing the way you view ordinary objects. Take crumpled balls, for example. An unassuming object with an extraordinarily complex shape. The path to get from an almost two-dimensional sheet to a three-dimensional object involves many energetic choices – whether it’s more efficient to fold in one direction or stretch in another. Understanding how crumpling happens has the potential to illuminate a lot of interesting physics about how folding happens in nature.

On Monday, Dominique Cambou presented the first results of a ostensibly simple project: mapping the 3D structure of a crumpled ball of aluminum foil. Cambou, a graduate student in Narayanan Menon's lab, systematically crumples balls and then subjects them to x-rays to image their internal structure.

Analysis is still in its early stages, but Cambou says she has already observed some interesting patterns.
The density of foil, for example, seems to be highest close to the surface. There seems to be something that inhibits folding closer to the center of the sheet. "It seems counterintuitive to me, since the entire sheet is connected," says Cambou. There also seems to be an unusual amount of layering in the foil.

Here's a picture of a reconstructed cross-section of a foil ball. The lines show the foil passing through the plane; the thinner the line, the more perpendicular the foil.

al1mil_thresh.jpg

Eventually Cambou says she hopes to link the final shape of the balls to the complex energetic path a sheet takes to achieve its final conformation.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4709

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.