« Climate war game: Negotiations commence | Main | Turtle power at SDB 2008 »

Turtle power at SDB 2008

I met Scott Gilbert http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/sgilber1/ of Swarthmore College and editor of a definitive text on Developmental Biology. He had told me that before his last invited talk, at a symposium honouring the retirement of his former mentor, most in attendance wondered what turtleshell was all about. The scientists, figuring the title of his talk referred to some wacky Drosophila gene name were surprised to find that Gilbert actually works on turtle shell development. Here he is with colleague Judith Cebra-Thomas at last evening’s poster session.
Gilbert.jpg
Gilbert and his colleagues have found that the bones that make up a turtle’s upper and lower shells develop by a bone development program called “intramembranous ossification” much like skull bones. They do their studies in the red eared slider, a common pet-shop favourite. Controversially, they’ve proposed that the shell develops from neural crest cells that migrate out from the neural tube after it closes. They injected a dye into the neural tube of turtle embryos and find them in the carapacial ridge (what will become the top shell of the turtle). They believe these cells then migrate to form the bottom shell.
I had to get a picture of their spiffy turtle shirts. I mentioned that they might not want their poster data showing up in the picture as I’d want to post it here. But they waved off those concerns saying they weren’t worried about their competition scooping them. OK, there probably aren't a whole lot of other turtle shell development labs. Besides, as one might expect, they’ve taken their Aesop seriously.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5720

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.