« Off I hop | Main | The BA Festival of Science: Death by bladder stone »

The BA Festival of Science: We need to discuss creationism in school science. Trust me, I was a biology teacher.

Posted by Katrina Charles, BA Media Fellow

Reverend Michael Reiss is the director of education at the Royal Society. And he is advocating discussing creationism in science classes. And he has a PhD in evolutionary biology. Hang on a second, this doesn’t look like the recipe for a standard creationism debate.

What Reiss believes is that when the issue of creationism or intelligent design is raised in the class room (and he expects it to be raised increasingly frequently) the teacher should discuss it as an alternative “worldview” but show why it is not a scientific theory and why evolution is a scientific theory.

Reiss said that his opinions were formed when he was a biology teacher at school “banging on about evolution”. He describes himself as having been “evangelical about evolution”. As a teacher he found that this approach meant that students who didn’t accept evolution would just turn off from science.

Reiss says an increasing number of children are from families who don’t believe in evolution, in part due to the increase in Muslim children from families that hold creationist views.

I had the chance to catch up with Jim Al Khalili (see blog from Tuesday) and discuss Reiss’ ideas. Al Khalili said that creationism is the same in Islam, Christianity and Judaism, but the difference in Islam is that there hasn’t been open discussion of the theory of evolution yet. At the moment, even people who accept natural selection would not accept that humans are part of that evolution. He went on to say that it is absolutely crucial that Muslims are part of the debate about creationism and science, but that the debate has to come from within.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6112

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.