« Neuroscience 2008: But how does the cat feel about dogs? | Main | Neuroscience 2008: History lessons »

Neuroscience 2008: Some NIH stats

The directors of each of the neuro-related National Institutes of Health convened for a press conference this morning. Those of us who were after hard news were a little disappointed, but I found the short talks a useful basis for the rest of the sessions, many of which I of course won't be able to get to given that the committee love to run at least six interesting things concurrently (like the Queen of Hearts, we are running to stay in the same place, but unlike her we cannot attend six impossible talks before breakfast).

Best for background was NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) director Tom Insel, who reminded us why many of the scientists at SfN do what they do: to help understand and treat neurological and mental illness. He gave us some sobering stats too: 90% of the 30,000 suicides in the US every year are due to mental illness; the average age at death of someone with a mental illness is 25 years less than a healthy contemporary, at 56 years of age; and while only 4% of the US population have a major mental illness, they smoke 44% of the cigarettes sold, hinting at the knock-on effects of diseases of the brain and mind on health in general.

So whilst a lot of the science here is fundamental in nature, it'll be useful to remember why it's being done - and where the dollars are coming from.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6650

Comments

Kerri,

and while only 4% of the US population have a major mental illness, they smoke 44% of the cigarettes sold.

Is this really true? It seems startlingly high. I'd be interested in a citation that backs this up.

Eric

This JAMA paper is the source of Insel's stats, and has been used before by various NIH directors in talking about mental health and smoking - Ed.

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.