« LPSC 2009: Basins abounding | Main | LPSC 2009: Venus or bust »

LPSC 2009: Dhofar, so far

One more update to the Late Heavy Bombardment story, then I'll shut up about it. I started that story with a discussion of Dhofar 961, a lunar meteorite that many think is the only found meteorite to have been chipped off of the South Pole Aitken Basin, the biggest and oldest basin on the moon, and the one that, once dated, should mark the beginning of the Late Heavy Bombardment. (Statistically, this is long overdue: There are more than 60 lunar meteorites, and South Pole Aitken covers almost 15% of the lunar surface. If meteorites fall from the moon to Earth randomly, then geologists should have around 10 from South Pole Aitken.)
Now, Brad Joliff, of Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, says he's even more sure it hails from the hole at the bottom of the moon. "We've tightened the argument by using more of the geochemistry that's available."
He used gamma-ray spectrometry data from Lunar Prospector for six main elements that had been tallied for each of hundreds of 5-degree squares on the moon. Comparing Dhofar 961's composition to each of the lunar squares, Joliff found that 9 out of the top 10 possible origins all lie within South Pole Aitken Basin. Next step: doing the painstaking radioisotopic dating work on miniature cores from the Dhofar sample.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/7776

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.