« @ApolloPlus40 - Neither rain nor snow... | Main | @ApolloPlus40 - Amateur eyes on the skies »

@ApolloPlus40 - Spinoffs

kidney.bmp

NASA has long touted the unplanned technological side effects of its cutting-edge research and engineering work.

Scientists, engineers, and contractors told the Wall Street Journal about a life raft with a bucket keel to prevent capsizing in rough water and an inner tube that inflated automatically to keep the raft afloat if its outer skin was punctured, a computer system to track down deadbeat dads, the inertial navigation systems that became standard equipment on commercial aircraft, and a thermal mapper developed for satellites used to prospect for oil, diagnose cause of sinking airport runways, and find sources of water pollution.

The list went on:

Other space age spinoffs were plastic resin marketed as commercial laminates, adhesives, and coatings ; devices to monitor internal stress in dams during earth tremors; data-processing techniques to record train traffic and to match power-generating capacities to demand; electromagnetic hammer that smoothed and shaped metal without weakening it; and luminous devices for aircraft exit signs, map reading, and gun sites. Medicine was benefiting from miniaturized electronic devices in cardiac pacemakers, remote-handling and manipulation equipment that had improved prosthetic devices like artificial limbs, space-helmet-like hoods to measure oxygen consumption while patient exercised, and computer to provide sharper x-ray photos.

From Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1969 Chronology on Science, Technology, and Policy [pdf]

For a sneak preview of the future, check out NASA's modern Spinoff website, which also has a document listing Apollo-era spinoffs [pdf].

Photo: Dialysis machines like this one were simplified by NASA's water recycling technology / NASA

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8736

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.