« Burgess Shale Centenary: Rats, goats, and jack hammers | Main | IUPAC '09: Thinking big to save the world »

Burgess Shale Centenary: Decaying pizza

Some of the weirder Ediacaran species might not be species after all, Alexander Liu of Oxford University has told the conference. There's a brand of squidgy Ediacaran fossils known collectively as 'pizza discs'. They are all round, and have bumpy bits – of up to 1-cm height in the fossil record – randomly scattered in the middle. These bumps are not consistent from one pizza disc to the next – each disc is individual. This makes it hard to identify the characteristics that define the creature that left the fossil print. So hard, in fact, that Liu wonders if it's not a specific creature after all. Some tell-tale hints in some pizza discs hint that maybe they are the slightly-decayed remnants of other, already-known species, he told the conference. Liu, who works in Martin Brasier's group, has even rotted some modern jellyfish and seaweed bits in the lab and made modern fossils of them, to confirm that this does indeed create irregular, lumpy shapes (no huge surprise there). His conclusion – that blobby bits that don't look like much might, in fact, be blobby bits that aren't anything much special – is so intuitively obvious that I can't help but think he's right. Depending on who you talk to, though, downgrading the Pizza disc from a creature to a bit of garbage might be slightly controversial.

Posted on behalf of Nicola Jones

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8994

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.