« ESA 2009: Nights in Inner Mongolia | Main | Burgess Shale Centenary: Yet more decay »

ESA 2009: China's water crisis

dujiangyan.jpgRoughly 100 billion cubic meters of groundwater is overexploited around Beijing. Nine years ago, that figure was 8 billion cubic meters.

Such were the dire numbers coming out of a presentation today by Ge Sun, a hydrologist at the US Department of Agriculture in Raleigh, North Carolina, on the state of China's water crisis. In the Daxing district of Beijing along, the water table has dropped 1.3 meters per year between 2001 and 2007. (I checked my notes three times to make sure that 'meters' is correct there, hard as it seems to believe.) More than 1,000 natural lakes have vanished. Forty percent of the country's rivers have become ephemeral. The rivers that manage to hang on are, more than half of them, polluted.

The factors are many: among them are population growth, mismanagement of land, increasing urbanization and low efficiency of using water, Sun said. And it was hard to miss the sense of urgency in his voice. Water resource issues and environmental disasters have become so rote in China over the past decades that it can be difficult -- at least for me, a jaded journalist -- to comprehend them getting any worse. But the economic boom in China is a whole new matter. Look at that number again of overexploited water in Beijing: 8 billion cubic meters in 2000, 100 billion cubic meters today. Where will we be in 2020?

Image: The 2,000-year-old Dujiangyan irrigation system in Sichuan province

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9006

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.