« Lepton Photon 2009: Hint of a Higgs? | Main | IAEA: More than non-proliferation at the old VIC »

Lepton Photon 2009: An LHC in every home

livingston.JPGSo what's next for high-energy physics? The LHC won’t be the end. Physicists will want to go to higher energies. The question is, how? The International Linear Collider -- a planned linac that will do for positrons and electrons what the LHC did for protons -- is what the community wants right now, but it won't go to any higher energies. It might be too expensive to build just to match the LHC's capabilities. Machines like the ILC struggle to achieve accelerating gradients of 30 MeV per metre, and the radio wave power delivered to the metallic cavities would melt them were they not supercooled and superconducting.
But all is not lost. SLAC's Mark Hogan gave a talk about all the novel accelerating technologies in the works. He presented the so-called Livingston chart, which at right shows the hard-won exponential increase in accelerator energies with time. Every few decades or so, an order of magnitude increase in energy is earned. But you can also see how each successive family of accelerator technologies – cyclotrons, synchrotrons, storage rings – leap to new heights, but taper off with time. Something has to be done. And Hogan thinks that wakefields will be the way to go -- using initial pulses to create a wave in a plasma, or a fiber, that in turn allow successive electron pulses to surf on the wake.
Of course, the technology is years away -- but it could offer gradients in the GeV per metre range. That would put desktop light sources within reach. Who knows -- maybe there could be desktop colliders, too. The future is wide open. But my future at Lepton Photon is quite limited. I am skipping out on Friday, the last day -- but have enjoyed my time in Hannover thoroughly. Thanks very much to the organizers.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9147

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by staff before being published. You can be as critical or controversial as you like, but please don't get personal or offensive, and do keep it brief. Excessively long entries may be cropped. Remember this is for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers or press releases.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. Email addresses are required: this is just in case we need to discuss your comment with you privately. They won’t be published.


Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'inthefield at nature.com'.