« Solar powered race sets off | Main | California sues for cleaner air »

Bookmark in Connotea

Cod ‘recovery’ claims - October 22, 2007

codgetty.bmpFishermen may have been rejoicing last week to see headlines proclaiming a ‘slight recovery’ for cod stocks in the North Sea (BBC, The Times, press release). However the so-ugly-they’re-kinda-cute fish still have a distinctly un-rosy future.

The International Council for the Exploration of the Seas is still saying quotas for cod need to be slashed. What is driving these ‘slight recovery’ stories is the number of young cod in the North Sea has shown a slight rise for a second year. Bertie Armstrong, of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, told the Times, “This is excellent news, reflecting scientific proof of what the fishermen had been reporting for some time – that cod was recovering in the North Sea.”

ICES breaks down its cod advice into geographic areas, here are the areas and some exerpt from their comments.
West of Scotland

The spawning stock biomass is at an all time low, but the total mortality is uncertain and probably high.
Irish Sea
Spawning biomass in relation to precautionary limits: Reduced reproductive capacity
Fishing mortality in relation to precautionary limits: Harvested unsustainably
Celtic Sea Cod
Harvested sustainably
North Sea / Eastern English Channel / Skagerrak
...at risk of being harvested unsustainably and suffering reduced reproductive capacity.
Rockall
No analytical assessment of this stock has been carried out.

Recovering they may be, but if fisherman want to be fishing a few years from now they’re still going to have to catch less cod. And if you are going out for fish and chips, don’t make it cod just yet.

Image: Getty

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to avoid spam. If you are having trouble with this system, you can send your comment by e-mail to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3752