« Nature’s history online | Main | Al Gore and IPCC share peace prize »

Bookmark in Connotea

‘Evolutionary scandal’ of sexless bug solved - October 12, 2007

bdelloidrotifer.JPGReproducing asexually means losing much of the ability to adapt to environmental changes that comes from combining the genes of two parents. So it had been thought that asexual animals would be disadvantaged over serious timescales. However the hard-to pronounce bdelloid rotifer has been around for 80 million years and Cambridge scientists say that its sex-free life is part of its robustness (BBC, Telegraph, The Scientist, and Reuters – which says 40 not 80m years).

The water-dwelling invertebrate has the neat trick of drying out when there is a lack of liquid and surviving in this desiccated state for years, until the rains or some other sort of water comes along. Dr Alan Tunnacliffe, from University of Cambridge, discovered that the beasties have a gene where the two copies can do totally different jobs: one prevents proteins from clumping together and the other helps to maintain cell membranes. This differs from organisms that reproduce sexually where the two copies have the same job.

“Evolution of gene function in this way can’t happen in sexual organisms, which means there could be some benefit to millions of years without sex after all,” he said (press release). He expanded on this point to Reuters: “It is like having a bigger tool kit. You can do the same job but better.”

The Telegraph thinks Tunnacliffe has solved one of evolutionary science’s biggest problems. “[T]his pond life has been the one ugly fact undermining the beauty of sex: the translucent organisms abandoned sex such a long time ago that they were once denounced as an ‘evolutionary scandal’ by the late and great biologist Prof John Maynard Smith.”

The research is published in Science.

Image: Bdelloid rotifer by N. N. Pouchkina-Stantcheva

Post a comment

Comments will be reviewed by the blog editors before being published, mainly to ensure that spam and irrelevant material (such as product advertisements) are not published . Please keep your comment brief. Excessively long or offensively phrased entries will be edited.

We strongly encourage you to use your real, full name. E-mail addresses are required in case we need to discuss your comment with you directly. We won't publish your e-mail address unless you request it.

Please enter the numbers you see below - this helps us to cut down on spam. Note that attempting to post within 30 seconds of hitting ‘preview’ or ‘post’ can cause the system to think you are spamming the site. If you are having trouble with this system, you can instead e-mail a comment to 'thegreatbeyond at nature.com'.

please enter code

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.nature.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3693